CaliforniaSchoolsCanyon Hills Junior High

Canyon Hills Junior High

PublicRegular
Chino Hills, California · Chino Valley Unified
Teachers37.0FTE
Ratio27.2:1students per teacher
Students1,007enrolled
SCHOOL SNAPSHOT
Students1,007
Grade Span7–8
Student:Teacher27.2:1
Free/Reduced Lunch28%
Title INo
SectorPublic
Visit school website →
Student : Teacher
27.4:1
0.7%vs prior yrUS avg 15.4:1
Teacher FTE
39
5.4%vs prior yr
Enrollment
1,070
6.3%vs prior yr
Years of Data
5
2020–2024
Counselors
1:1,119
0.4%vs prior yrASCA max 1:250
Nurses
NASN max 1:750
Psychologists
NASP max 1:500
Social Workers
SSWAA max 1:250
Trends & 5-year history below

Pupil : Teacher Ratio — 5-Year Trend

14.1:117.9:121.8:125.6:129.5:133.3:12020202120222023202432.0:125.9:127.1:127.2:127.4:1Canyon Hills Junior HighUS public-school avg

Enrollment & Teacher FTE

9981,0241,0501,0761,1021,128353637383940202020212022202320241,1191,0341,0301,0071,0703540383739EnrollmentTeacher FTE

Year-by-year workforce

Metric20202021202220232024Nat Avg
Enrollment1,1191,0341,0301,0071,070
Teacher FTE3540383739
Pupil : Teacher ratio32.0:125.9:127.1:127.2:127.4:115.4:1

What These Numbers Mean

Teacher FTE

Full-Time Equivalent counts part-time teachers proportionally. One full-time teacher = 1.0 FTE; two half-time teachers also = 1.0 FTE. This is the standard federal reporting unit.

Pupil : Teacher ratio

NCES-reported ratio divides total enrollment by teacher FTE. It is NOT the same as average class size — schools with specialists, coaches, and resource teachers will show lower ratios than typical class sizes.

How to read the trend

A falling pupil:teacher ratio (line going down) means more staffing per student — generally a positive signal. A rising line can indicate budget pressure or fast enrollment growth outpacing hiring. Always compare to the US average (dashed grey).

Historical data spans 20202024 from NCES CCD.

Student Support & Wellbeing

Non-teaching staff who support student mental health, physical health, and behavioural needs. Lower pupil-to-staff ratios mean more one-on-one access.

Counselors & Social Workers — staff to pupils (recommended 1:250)

1:01:2421:4831:7251:9671:1,2092015201720201:1,1141:1,1141:1,119Counselor : PupilsSocial Worker : PupilsRecommended 1:250

Nurses & Psychologists — staff to pupils

1:01:6021:1,2031:1,8051:2,4061:3,0082015201720201:1,8571:2,785Nurse : PupilsNASN 1:750Psychologist : PupilsNASP 1:500

Support staffing & ratios — year by year

Metric201520172020Nat Avg
Counselors (FTE)111
Nurses (FTE)0.6
Psychologists (FTE)0.4
Social Workers (FTE)0
Counselor : Pupils1:1,1141:1,1141:1,1191:250
Nurse : Pupils1:1,8571:750
Psychologist : Pupils1:2,7851:500
Social Worker : Pupils1:250

Why these ratios matter

Counselors (ASCA 250:1)

School counselors support academic planning, college & career readiness, and social-emotional wellbeing. The American School Counselor Association recommends no more than 250 students per counselor.

Nurses (NASN 750:1)

School nurses manage chronic conditions, medications, immunisations, and emergencies. The National Association of School Nurses recommends at least 1 full-time nurse per 750 students (more for high-need populations).

Psychologists (NASP 500:1)

School psychologists assess learning & behavioural needs, run mental-health interventions, and coordinate special-education services. NASP recommends 500:1 or lower.

Social workers (SSWAA 250:1)

School social workers bridge home-school relationships, address attendance & trauma, and connect families to community resources. SSWAA recommends 250:1.

Source: US Dept of Education CRDC (20152020) — Civil Rights Data Collection.